| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
MoboCop
Drunken Master
Joined: 18 Jan 2000
Posts: 8854
Location: Fresno
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
poiuy223
Green Belt
Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 174
|
 Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 7:52 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| hey patrick, for the performance under Far Cry, Mushkin should be 71.20 FPS intead of 81.20. I think I made a typo. Sorry |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Toby B.
Lead Mobo-fu Master
Joined: 16 Dec 2001
Posts: 13393
Location: Maine
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 8:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It nice seeing more participants this time around...
_________________
We Help You. You Can Help Us!
Read the rules prior to posting
Tell your newsgroup or mailing list
Link to us from your pages |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
zerozero
Green Belt
Joined: 07 Jan 2005
Posts: 125
Location: Atlanta, GA
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 8:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| It is interesing to note that their performance is virtually indistinguisable from each other but the price ranges from $230 (PQI) to $378 (Corsair)! @newegg |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
poiuy223
Green Belt
Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 174
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 8:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| yup. you honestly cant go wrong with your band of choice, but for the wise buyer, pqi or centon would seem more "reasonable" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MoboCop
Drunken Master
Joined: 18 Jan 2000
Posts: 8854
Location: Fresno
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| poiuy223 wrote: | | hey patrick, for the performance under Far Cry, Mushkin should be 71.20 FPS intead of 81.20. I think I made a typo. Sorry |
fixed
_________________
Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted - Albert Einstien |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
poiuy223
Green Belt
Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 174
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2005 12:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| thanks patrick |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HollowPoint69
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2005 8:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| So is DDR2 still slower than DDR memory, is it even, or is it finally getting better? What's the deal? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
poiuy223
Green Belt
Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 174
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2005 12:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ddr2 is good if you can have low latency, such as the centon. for tasks that use up high bandwidth, ddr2 should be better because it can carry twice the amount of data. but because most people upgrade for the latest games, and games dont carry much data, ddr with low latency is definitely better. as of now, there isnt a huge gap of difference. ddr is better only cuz its still cheaper. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
colinJohn
Black Belt 3rd Degree
Joined: 24 Jul 2004
Posts: 3430
Location: UK
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2005 12:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
so would ddr2 be better for video encoding and image processing?
_________________
"that's some catch that Catch 22"
"It's the best that there is"
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
