| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
HelenDorathi Pilgrim

Joined: 19 Dec 2009 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2009 3:42 am Post subject: Search Engines |
|
|
In totaling, search engines like Google have diminutive concentration in how your website gives the impression of being; their simply real interest is in the content you make available. For that motive, Google doesn't yearn for to download all the style in sequence connected with your Web Design Services website.
Not only would responsibility so mean the employ of additional of your bandwidth each time Google's sycophant robots appointment your site, it'd create it harder for Google to successfully set up and sort from side to side your content.
If you were inquired to discover a needle (the content) in a haystack (a mess of table tags), you'd obtain to a certain extent aggravated. If the spine was alienated from the haystack, you'd contain a much more enjoyable understanding, and obtain the complete torment over with in a much quicker era of time.
This would probable consequence in you appearing more constructively upon the someone who set you the task to do. It makes sagacity, right?
Well, that is no dissimilar with search engines. If you desire them to be fond of you, play by the guiding principle and you will be no-expense-spared over persons that do not. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fussnfeathers Mobo-fu Master


Joined: 04 Dec 2008 Posts: 3093 Location: under my desk with a roast beef sandwich
|
Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2009 3:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Uh.............sorry, did you use Google Translate for that? That made zero sense. _________________ Mine go to 11 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AmEv Black Belt


Joined: 20 Jun 2009 Posts: 654 Location: Wanting to be at these forums, but not as active as they
|
Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2009 10:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
(s)he probably did. That, other than Babelfish, is one of the few places to get some Engrish.
From what I could understand, they're wondering why search engines bring so much irrelevant results. _________________ I'm gonna get my new hardware. And my worklog here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Karlsweldt Enlightened Master


Joined: 12 Nov 2003 Posts: 18456 Location: 07438
|
Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2009 12:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The search engines work first with "exact match" then "best match" for the search criteria input. You could use an exclusion (-) marker for specific fields, to narrow the results.
With any language conversions, the only proper way is to have the person know the final language in his/her native speech.. then converting the other language to that standard. Whenever a person converts their native language to another, the phonetics and geometry of speech can be carried over, causing parsing errors.
We should not fault a person for improper parsing of language translation. _________________ F@H.. to solve mankind's maladies.. in our lifetimes! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AmEv Black Belt


Joined: 20 Jun 2009 Posts: 654 Location: Wanting to be at these forums, but not as active as they
|
Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2009 12:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Karlsweldt wrote: | Whenever a person converts their native language to another, the phonetics and geometry of speech can be carried over, causing parsing errors.
We should not fault a person for improper parsing of language translation. |
You're right. What I was trying to say was essentially that. _________________ I'm gonna get my new hardware. And my worklog here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fussnfeathers Mobo-fu Master


Joined: 04 Dec 2008 Posts: 3093 Location: under my desk with a roast beef sandwich
|
Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2009 1:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I know, I deal with kids from all sorts of languages on a game forum, but this post makes absolutely no sense at all. _________________ Mine go to 11 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BrevCampagnolo Black Belt 1st Degree


Joined: 30 Oct 2003 Posts: 1239 Location: Mucus City, USA
|
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 9:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I understood perfectly. Dunno what the hell is wrong with the rest of you. Could be you're behind on Quaaludes. _________________ -- Campy
"Computers in the future may weigh no more than 1.5 tons."
- Popular Mechanics, 1949 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|