The Mother Board
Power consumption between different MB chipsets?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Mother Board Forum Index -> General
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
videobruce
Anti-Static Strap
Anti-Static Strap


Joined: 31 Jan 2003
Posts: 450
Location: Buffalo NY

PostPosted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 4:11 am    Post subject: Power consumption between different MB chipsets? Reply with quote

Using the same (or very similar components, is there any power consumption difference between different motherboard chipsets?

Example: AMD 970 vs 990 vs 990FX.

Using the same processor and same number and types of drives and same chipset video card (apples vs apples) is there any lees draw with a 970 vs the step up 990 or 990FX? with no overclocking on processor or video card and running same O/S with the same power settings in the BIOS & the O/S.
_________________
Copyright protection & Intellectual property my ass. All the studios want is more money & control. Enough is enough!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Karlsweldt
Enlightened Master
Enlightened Master


Joined: 12 Nov 2003
Posts: 18694
Location: 07438

PostPosted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 10:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Depends on what features are active in the chipset. If a video port is part of the chipset, then power needs would be up to 3x higher than "base" needs.
From checking many data links, it appears the chipset in "base" status would draw around 20 watts max of +3.3 volts and +5 volts power. Example:
Today's chipset versions use less power than previous ones, due to the memory controller being on the CPU die.. not in the main or Northbridge chipset.
If more than four SATA plus six USB ports are part of the chipset design, then yes some extra power demands are there. But rarely will a chipset draw more than 25 watts of power, with today's designs. A massive heatsink with fan on the chipset gives away its power-hungry status!
The main power consumption for any design is the CPU itself. A single- or dual-core being the most frugal. With multi-core units that are not intended for mobile use, all cores typically stay near 100% activity. The mobile core design can switch active cores on and off rapidly, as needed.. conserving power.
_________________
F@H.. to solve mankind's maladies.. in our lifetimes!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
videobruce
Anti-Static Strap
Anti-Static Strap


Joined: 31 Jan 2003
Posts: 450
Location: Buffalo NY

PostPosted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 4:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Depends on what features are active in the chipset.
Going on the assumption there is no on board video and the same functions/ports/devices are active, will power consumption at the outlet be the same?

Quote:
The mobile core design can switch active cores on and off rapidly, as needed.. conserving power.
PC chipsets with the same O/S do not have that ability?
_________________
Copyright protection & Intellectual property my ass. All the studios want is more money & control. Enough is enough!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
evasive
Mobo-fu Master
Mobo-fu Master


Joined: 06 May 2001
Posts: 36479
Location: Netherlands, Breda

PostPosted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 2:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://support.amd.com/us/ChipsetMotherboard_TechDocs/48691.pdf

page 5-2, there is a difference in the TDP for each:
Quote:
RD990: 19.6
RD980: 14
RX980: 13.6


which suggest there will be a difference in power consumption for everyday use. There is no information whatsoever on how much that actually is worst case...
_________________
We hate rut, but we fear change.



System error, strike any user to continue...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Karlsweldt
Enlightened Master
Enlightened Master


Joined: 12 Nov 2003
Posts: 18694
Location: 07438

PostPosted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 6:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
PC chipsets with the same O/S do not have that ability?

Chipsets remain in a constant "on" state, but would require less power while there is no data flow. The processor by itself has several instruction sets to attain an idle or full operational state within microseconds. If the chipsets were to go into an "idle" state, communication links to devices may be lost, and it may take a minute or more to regain the links. Reference: When no data is being processed, the cores go into an almost immediate idle or stand-by state. When a command is initiated, the cores resume full activity. [simplified explanation].
Only the "mobile" processor class has this state of activity. The 'standard' processor would go into an idle state (lower power consumption) only after a set time of inactivity has expired, but not the very reduced power need state of a mobile processor.
_________________
F@H.. to solve mankind's maladies.. in our lifetimes!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Mother Board Forum Index -> General All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group