| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Smurfcorpse
Black Belt
Joined: 23 Nov 2001
Posts: 768
Location: NY
|
 Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2010 12:37 am Post subject: Folding for the University of Notre Dame |
 |
|
Some IP addresses my firewall connects to are 129.74.85.16 (or 15):80 (or 8080). IP look up shows they belong to the University of Notre Dame. My F@H Project: 10039 (Run 209, Clone 0, Gen 39 is turning in projects to that IP but the log of the work unit says Stanford?
I hope I'm getting all the points due.
_________________
It's always funny until someone loses an Operating System! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Karlsweldt
Enlightened Master
Joined: 12 Nov 2003
Posts: 18456
Location: 07438
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2010 2:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The F@H project is immense. Likely Stanford does not have enough servers to handle all the work. It is likely there are more than 400,000 F@H users! Several universities world-wide are likely intermediate "hosts" for the F@H project, to make connections easier. Universities can easily afford high-speed Internet connections, which we as private users deem too expensive.
If your work units are tagged with the team number and your user name, the credits will come to you.
WIKI bio:
_________________
F@H.. to solve mankind's maladies.. in our lifetimes! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pette Broad
Black Belt 5th Degree
Joined: 10 Jul 2001
Posts: 5485
Location: Flintshire, U.K
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2010 5:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, Karl's correct. There are at least 2 other Universities hosting Folding@Home. I think the non Stanford sites are for projects that are of interest to that particular uni.
Pete
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Karlsweldt
Enlightened Master
Joined: 12 Nov 2003
Posts: 18456
Location: 07438
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 09, 2010 2:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nice signature, Pete!
_________________
F@H.. to solve mankind's maladies.. in our lifetimes! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pette Broad
Black Belt 5th Degree
Joined: 10 Jul 2001
Posts: 5485
Location: Flintshire, U.K
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 6:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Karlsweldt wrote: | | Nice signature, Pete! |
Yeah, AmEv fixed it for me 
Pete
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
AmEv
Black Belt
Joined: 20 Jun 2009
Posts: 654
Location: Wanting to be at these forums, but not as active as they
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 10:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
TBH, I looked at Evasive's tecnique for displaying.
_________________
I'm gonna get my new hardware. And my worklog here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pette Broad
Black Belt 5th Degree
Joined: 10 Jul 2001
Posts: 5485
Location: Flintshire, U.K
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 5:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| AmEv wrote: | | TBH, I looked at Evasive's tecnique for displaying. |
So did I (ages ago), the difference was that I couldn't make it work 
Pete
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
AmEv
Black Belt
Joined: 20 Jun 2009
Posts: 654
Location: Wanting to be at these forums, but not as active as they
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 7:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Pette Broad wrote: | | AmEv wrote: | | TBH, I looked at Evasive's tecnique for displaying. |
So did I (ages ago), the difference was that I couldn't make it work
Pete |
[sarcasm]Yeah, that's how you're gonna play, huh?[/sarcasm]
Seriously though.
You're glad your sig's fixed, and I'm glad I have a machine decent enough to fold.
_________________
I'm gonna get my new hardware. And my worklog here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
