The Mother Board

by **Tau** » Fri Oct 31, 2003 8:52 pm

Beats my 17 mins per frame :cry:

Downloaded this Stinker on the 26/10 and its just this minute finished.

by **Tulatin** » Fri Oct 31, 2003 9:06 pm

that really sucks dude... i've got a tinker 400 (see earlier posts for model #) that's at 330/400. It did about 200 frames in 6 hours today... (toppin out at 4 mins per frame)

by **miki02131** » Fri Oct 31, 2003 9:11 pm

If we can go off topic for a second, I fail to understand why my system works out more WUs than Tulatin for example and yet I got far less points. There must be something wrong. Or Should I ask, what did you do Tulatin? Can you post your settings, dude?

by **Tulatin** » Fri Oct 31, 2003 9:14 pm

You have less points because the work unit i've turned in have a higher point value. Either that, or free bonus points for team founder :mrgreen:

here's my settings - graphical windows client -
-forceasm -advmethods . That's it.

by **danny the bum** » Fri Oct 31, 2003 9:57 pm

Tulatin, you sure fold good for your system. I mean your running at 2.5 right now? I take it p4's fold better? Yeah, I guess I am folding alright. But considering my computer is new, and tulatin's is a year old, and he is folding at the same rate. That makes me sort of disappointed, but happy for Tulatin of course

.

by **Tulatin** » Fri Oct 31, 2003 11:04 pm

Actually, i've just got a northwood 2.0 @ 2.5 - 500 Mhz FSB. As to the P4 folding better, i don't know why, but it's true. However, your rig should be outperforming mine at stock speeds danny.

by **len444** » Sat Nov 01, 2003 12:14 am

Southwind25 wrote:I finally got my Barton sorted out. I'm doing a tinker on it too. It's running at 2200 mhz and doing a frame every 4 miuntes and 35 seconds, so I'd say your's was performing about where it should be Danny. Len, I'm running the graphical version and I can't seem to find the point values for WU's. What should a 400 frame tinker be worth?

look up wu's here:
http://folding.stanford.edu/psummary.html

it will be stated for sure in the fahlog.txt file. there is also a file for the currently running wu, and will show % completion. my computer-> hdd partition where OS is-> programs-> FAH and check out the files there (i'm sure you know this

)!

by **Tulatin** » Sat Nov 01, 2003 12:15 am

or, if you're graphical, right click, status, log file.

by **len444** » Sat Nov 01, 2003 12:21 am

miki02131 wrote:If we can go off topic for a second, I fail to understand why my system works out more WUs than Tulatin for example and yet I got far less points. There must be something wrong. Or Should I ask, what did you do Tulatin? Can you post your settings, dude?

first we need to determine if you are completing wu's 100%, or sending in partially completed ones for partial credit.

by **Tulatin** » Sat Nov 01, 2003 12:22 am

That is true - one or two of miki's may be partial. Mine are all full subs.

The Mother Board

Is this slow?

Who is online