LCD for Gaming?

Not sure what to buy? Ask here for some free advice.

Moderator: The Mod Squad

Post Reply
Green Belt
Green Belt
Posts: 158
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2002 4:08 pm

LCD for Gaming?

Post by bigdog10 »

I bought this SAMSUNG 172MP last week. Its kewl because it has a TV tuner built in for PIP while computing. Well my opinion is it sux for gaming. It says 700:1 contrast but no way. I want a LCD for gaming (19"). Anyone having luck with LCD's yet, I dont want the radiation from the CRT's anymore.
Black Belt
Black Belt
Posts: 519
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2003 8:31 pm
Location: under rt30 bridge, Wrightsville, Pa

Post by geh1 »

sorry boss, still looking at mine thru candle light.
Asus P4P800 Deluxe
P4 2.8g at 3.1g
(2) Seagate baracudda 40g hdd's in raid
12g WD hd for bu on pri ide
512mb Kingston 3200 sdram
dvd & burner, win98se,1 of 3 in network , and 2 sec cams.
User avatar
Black Belt 1st Degree
Black Belt 1st Degree
Posts: 1517
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2003 10:52 pm
Location: Arizona

Post by triggerhappy41 »

I think you will still probably have problems for a year or two for that. LCD's are getting much more popular, but they dont have the response times for games. Even the ones with 16ms response are lieing, they still suck.
CPU=AMD Athlon X2 3800+
RAM=Corsair XMS DDR400 1GB 2-3-3-6 Timings
VID=EVGA GeForce 7950GT
HDD=74GB WD Raptor
Black Belt
Black Belt
Posts: 853
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 4:44 pm
Location: VA

Post by joemc911 »

I thought I had seen a few posts or replies recently about LCDs being ok for gaming, but I can't for the life of me recall in what thread.

Fact of the matter is that I don't think you will find many true gamers recommending LCDs. Most will stick with CRT monitors because the display is superior and refresh rates are considerably better. For the money you just can't really compare the CRTs and LCDs. LCDs, in my opinion, are best for those who need to save space or don't do a lot of graphic intensive applications and don't worry so much about what they are looking at. I'm really not knocking LCDs, they are really coming along fast for new technology, but they just don't do the job well enough for gamers I don't think.
Thermaltake V3 Black Edition Mid Tower Case
1 x OCZ ModXStream Pro OCZ700MXSP 700W ATX12V V2.2
Intel Core i5-760 Lynnfield 2.8GHz LGA 1156 95W Quad-Core
Kingston HyperX 8GB (4x2GB) 240-Pin DDR3 1333
Western Digital RE3 WD1002FBYS 1TB 7200 RPM SATA 3.0Gb/s 3.5
LG UH08LS10 Blu-ray Disc Combo Drive
Brown Belt
Brown Belt
Posts: 289
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2004 12:32 am
Location: Somewhere near the internet

Post by inteljunky »

they do have another problem.... they need to perfect the manufacturing process because they can come with dead pixels. IMO they should have perfected that before they mass produced them.
Mobo-fu Master
Mobo-fu Master
Posts: 18948
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 3:04 am
Location: Barksdale AFB, LA

Post by Sabrewings »

Absolutely. And I hate that you can't really change the resolution too well. They're great for office PC's and school PC's cause they take up little room. But, for my first-person shooters and real-time strategy games, I'm sticking with my 17" flatscreen CRT for a LONG time :)
[url=][b]RIAA vs The People[/b][/url]
Posts: 20
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2001 12:01 am
Location: Texas, USA

Post by Nomad »

I use a Samsung 191T and have for a little over a year now. Play Halo PC, C&C Generals, and some MMOGs thrown in for good measure.

I love it. I haven't had any problems with it, it's nice and bright, and very responsive. Orginally I had it hooked up with an analog connection to my MMX 440, but now it's on a digital connection to my 5600U and it seems clearer/crisper than it did before.

Anyway, I recommand it.
Post Reply