The Mother Board

Motherboards.org forums. Free tech support, motherboard ID, and more.
It is currently Fri Sep 21, 2018 1:48 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Sep 17, 2002 5:45 pm 
Offline
Mobo-fu Master
Mobo-fu Master

Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2002 2:48 pm
Posts: 2079
Location: Harney, MD
Is there a reliable OS that most games will work on other then windows? :roll:

Edit: I am running Windows 2000 pro now. Will most games work on that platform? I really do not wont to shell out $200 for an over rated OS.

_________________
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Benjamin Franklin (1706 - 1790)

"A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have."
Gerald Ford (1913 - 2006)


Last edited by greytrains on Thu Sep 19, 2002 6:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 17, 2002 9:36 pm 
Offline
Enlightened Master
Enlightened Master

Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2002 1:03 am
Posts: 17135
Location: England
Either backtrack to windows 98se or upgrade to XP. Win2000 is a very poor OS to run games on.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 18, 2002 7:36 am 
Offline
Green Belt
Green Belt

Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2002 1:28 pm
Posts: 193
Location: Chicago
Most modern games that require Directx hardware acceleration will not run under windows 2000. This would include most shooters and other games where frame per second are important. There are plenty of other games that will run on 2000 such as the Sims and Civilivation III.

Windows 98SE is the best for machines with 128 MB or less, Pentium II's or small hard drives. However it is not entirly stable.

Fast processors, lots of memory and large hard drives run great with XP. I have never had a game crash and can switch back and fourth to the desktop with little problem.

I believe you can now get the home edition for less than 100.

_________________
ANTEC SX1040b case,ASUS A7V333,AMD Athlon XP 2200+ ,Thermaltake Volcano 9
512mb Corsair PC2100,120 GB WD w 8mb Cache,GAIDWARD Geforce4 TI4600,NEC Multisynch A500


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 19, 2002 10:37 am 
Offline
Green Belt
Green Belt

Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2001 12:01 am
Posts: 207
Location: Garner NC
The only games I've been unable to run on Windows 2000 are very old games written in the days of 3x and early Win95. They won't run quite as fast on 2000 as on 98se or XP, but they are perfectly playable with an adequate video card, preferably an nVidia one. You're talking about a loss of maybe 5-10 percent of your FPS, that's all.

If you're building a gaming rig, I don't recommend 2000, but I still believe that for general use, it's the best Windows there is.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 19, 2002 12:07 pm 
Offline
Mobo-fu Master
Mobo-fu Master

Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2001 1:01 am
Posts: 19405
Location: 00000h - 0000Fh
I don't know. In my experience with Windows 2000, there seems to be very little multimedia support/capabilities. My laptop drivers for Windows 2000 produced speratic sound and graphics.

While I believe its a good applications operating system, I think its pretty crappy for gaming.

_________________
"Imagination is the only weapon in the war against reality." -Jules de Gautier

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 19, 2002 5:28 pm 
Offline
Mobo-fu Master
Mobo-fu Master

Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2002 2:48 pm
Posts: 2079
Location: Harney, MD
From everything I am reading, http://www.motherboards.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=7534, I am not sure I want to install XP. 8O I am building a new system and I wanted to see if it is worth the money and time to upgrade to a new OS

Edit: I have been running 2000 for about a year now, and I have never had it crash on me. The only problem I have is that my system is too slow for most of the newer games

_________________
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Benjamin Franklin (1706 - 1790)

"A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have."
Gerald Ford (1913 - 2006)


Last edited by greytrains on Thu Sep 19, 2002 6:30 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 19, 2002 6:23 pm 
Offline
Initiate
Initiate

Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2002 1:01 am
Posts: 98
Location: Davenport, IA
I went from Win98SE to XP, and am an avid gamer. I have 256DDRAM, maybe I should get more...

Anyway, I crash to desktop much more often than 98SE, and am thinking of partitioning or just reverting back. Playing Mafia, I reboot or crash to desktop about once an hour or so. Just got done playing an hour and a half of Dark Age of Camelot, and crashed to desktop three times.

I have no progs in the background, other than XP's crap, have latest drivers/updates, and have never had a firewall installed or virus program to fudge up my online gaming.

I'd have to say, Win98SE is the best bet right now. I like WinXP, it just isn't cutting it for gaming.



MSI K7T266a
AMD Athlon XP2000
Volcano 6+
Asus GeForce 3ti 200
Maxtor 40gb
Asus 32/12/40 CD-RW
Maxtop Coolcase, side fan and top fan
Enermax 365 PS


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 20, 2002 5:10 am 
Offline
Black Belt 1st Degree
Black Belt 1st Degree

Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2001 1:01 am
Posts: 1903
Location: McKinney, Tx
My vote is for 98SE. When properly installed (with minimal fluff) and fully patched (off windows update) it can be very stable. The biggest reason why Win 98SE is still so populaur is it's relatively small resource footprint. That means more resources for your games.

I'd still probably upgrade to XP someday in the future. Maybe after my next CPU upgrade or after I get a good chance to really look at the OS to see what I'm missing.

_________________
0100101001001101
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 20, 2002 10:18 am 
Offline
Black Belt 3rd Degree
Black Belt 3rd Degree

Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2001 1:01 am
Posts: 3987
Quote:
My vote is for 98SE. When properly installed (with minimal fluff) and fully patched (off windows update) it can be very stable.


:?: just curious- define "minimal fluff". perhaps you can reference some material/ guides/ tweaks?

:idea: perhaps some os tweak guides/ links should be referenced at the top of the os forum (and indicate slant- ie gaming, office, ect...)?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 20, 2002 10:24 am 
Offline
Initiate
Initiate

Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2002 1:01 am
Posts: 98
Location: Davenport, IA
I think he means, excess programs that run in da background. The less you have going on, the more free memory and resources you have. No wallpaper, few icons, no proggies in the taskbar and other places, etc...


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group