The Mother Board

Motherboards.org forums. Free tech support, motherboard ID, and more.
It is currently Sat Dec 15, 2018 11:08 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 30, 2002 10:12 pm 
Offline
Enlightened Master
Enlightened Master

Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2002 1:03 am
Posts: 17148
Location: England
The easiest way to convert from FAT32 to NTFS is to use PARTITION MAGIC v7. It does it all for you! NTFS is far more stable for the XP platform, that is why I use that file system.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: converting to ntfs
PostPosted: Sun Sep 01, 2002 10:48 pm 
Offline
Pilgrim
Pilgrim

Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 3:24 am
Posts: 16
Location: NZ
i take it your running xp ??
the best source and most unused is the help file in the OS.
look there.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 02, 2002 3:15 am 
Offline
Initiate
Initiate

Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2002 7:32 pm
Posts: 52
Location: Terra,Dixie,USA
Thnks to all for your help and opinions. Since I had just built this machine, I didn't have much on it except the OS. Once I decided to change over to NTFS it was a simple matter of resetting the array and reformatting. :D

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2002 5:15 pm 
Offline
Green Belt
Green Belt

Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2001 12:01 am
Posts: 207
Location: Garner NC
Good luck. If the security features of NTFS are of value to you, it's a fairly simple thing to switch. As for me, I've stayed on FAT32 and it works perfectly well on Windows 2000.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2002 9:40 pm 
Offline
Black Belt 1st Degree
Black Belt 1st Degree

Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2001 1:01 am
Posts: 1347
I recently discovered an odd difference between NTFS and FAT32. I downloaded an ISO containing images of four disks in one file onto my wife's XP machine formatted with NTFS. I went to transfer this file to my Win2K machine formatted with FAT32 and I got an error about the file containing multiple data streams and that FAT32 does not support this and data would be lost. Never heard of anyting like this before. I know it's a bit of a bunny trail from the main topic, but hopefully kind of interesting for those debating between the two file systems.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 06, 2002 1:19 pm 
Offline
Initiate
Initiate

Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2002 7:32 pm
Posts: 52
Location: Terra,Dixie,USA
Another side note; Your floppy is no longer usable with NTSF as far as copying. It will still read. This is do to the overhead in the file structure being larger than 1.44mgs to start with. No big whoop. I only use mine during OS installs with RAID. 8)

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: converting to ntfs
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2002 12:02 pm 
Offline
Initiate
Initiate

Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 10:26 am
Posts: 81
tismee wrote:
the best source and most unused is the help file in the OS.


That would be a first for Microsoft....

_________________
A rectangular bear is just a polar bear after a coordinate transform. - I dunno who


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 10, 2002 4:07 pm 
Offline
Initiate
Initiate

Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2002 7:32 pm
Posts: 52
Location: Terra,Dixie,USA
Hey noggin, love that avatar! :lol: :lol:

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 16, 2002 4:19 am 
Offline
Green Belt
Green Belt

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2002 1:01 am
Posts: 211
feto wrote:
i know that when using ntfs you dont need to defrag your hard drive as often as you do using fat32 since it has a newer way of storing files.....also..it does not do scan discs like fat32......


I heard that this was the other way around, and it seems to be the case when I run DisKeeper, i get tons more fragments than I used too...


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 16, 2002 8:51 pm 
Offline
Black Belt 1st Degree
Black Belt 1st Degree

Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2001 1:01 am
Posts: 1347
The fragmentation is due to the smaller cluster size. It helps prevent wasted space due to half-used clusters, but it does make it easier for files to end up scattered across the disk.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group