The Mother Board

Motherboards.org forums. Free tech support, motherboard ID, and more.
It is currently Fri Sep 21, 2018 3:59 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Feb 18, 2003 8:52 pm 
Offline
Green Belt
Green Belt

Joined: Wed May 29, 2002 12:36 pm
Posts: 183
Location: Texa$$
With Pentium's new 3.06Ghz processor, will AMD ever catch up with Pentium, or will it be left in the dust, possibly for good this time?

_________________
Hold that thought.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 19, 2003 12:14 pm 
Offline
Black Belt 1st Degree
Black Belt 1st Degree

Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2001 1:01 am
Posts: 1903
Location: McKinney, Tx
http://www.motherboards.org/articlesd/h ... 232_1.html

_________________
0100101001001101
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 20, 2003 8:37 am 
Offline
Black Belt 1st Degree
Black Belt 1st Degree

Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2002 12:00 am
Posts: 1359
I don't think elimination of any competition "for good" is anything to wish for. Even if the P4 is arguably better by speed, AMD is responsible for there even being one. Who else can contend? VIA?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 20, 2003 10:27 am 
Offline
Black Belt 1st Degree
Black Belt 1st Degree

Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2001 1:01 am
Posts: 1903
Location: McKinney, Tx
It is also interesting that Intel is lowering their prices soon, and AMD already has lowered theirs. For a market leader Intel should have taken the initiative first.

AMD is still the underdog, but I like their style. Smaller instruction pipes that don't waste clock cycles just to refill because of their size. Actual CPU design that improves in functionality with each chip release instead of actually relying on faster clock speeds.

It would be interesting if some of the time related benchmarks shows scores relating to number of computations instead of time taken to run.

_________________
0100101001001101
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 21, 2003 12:05 am 
Offline
Black Belt 3rd Degree
Black Belt 3rd Degree

Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2001 1:01 am
Posts: 3987
quad opteron configuration! author thinks seti would be a good test to prove it's worth (i actually don't see the critacism of testing methodology- must have been a slashdot review).

http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/article/1596/
another link:
http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/article/1593/


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 24, 2003 3:07 am 
Offline
Green Belt
Green Belt

Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2003 11:12 am
Posts: 108
Location: Southern Illinois
Johnny Mnemonic wrote:
http://www.motherboards.org/articlesd/hardware-reviews/1232_1.html

Thanks for setting the public in the right with this incredible review of the 3000+ Barton
As for previous posts, I wouldn't say that AMD will be in the dust, nor have they ever be.
Some people have only used Intel and they just stay that way, but when you cross over to test out an AMD I won't be the only one saying "AMDme" around here.

_________________
Asus A7V333 Raid w/ AMD Athlon XP 1700+ DLT3C 0319@ 2.16 cooled via Thermalright AX-7 and an 80mm crystal led fan from SVC, 512 MB Corsair XMS PC3200 'LL' DDR, ATi Radeon 9800XT 256MB


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 24, 2003 3:53 pm 
Offline
Pilgrim
Pilgrim

Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2003 3:26 pm
Posts: 5
About the motherboards.org review of the AMD 3000+, it was not even tested against a Pentium 4 3.06 with HyperThreading enabled! Read the fine prints:

Intel System
Motherboard: ASUS P4G8X
CPU: Intel P4 3.06GHz (Actual) HT Disabled <---- !!!!

I stopped reading at that point. It renders the whole review meaningless. Would you turn off the turbo on a car you are reviewing in order to compare it to another car? One can hardly be more biased. And I would be just as upset if a pro-intel person decided to disable a feature of the Athlon XP (say an extra pipeline). The author did not even explain his reason for disabling HT on a motherboard (P4G8X) which supports it , one could be lead to believe he was hiding the fact that testing was biased. I'm neither pro-AMD nor pro-Intel, I'm pro-Higher-Performance-Price-Ratio considering what I can afford. I certainly expect fairness when it comes to reviews and will speak freely when I detect blatant unfairness.

Vyrux


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 24, 2003 4:41 pm 
Offline
Black Belt 1st Degree
Black Belt 1st Degree

Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2001 1:01 am
Posts: 1903
Location: McKinney, Tx
Uh oh, you've unconvered a CONSPIRACY!

watch out, they are listening!

Seriously you would probably find that for the tests run, hyperthreading would not offer much of an improvement. Doc Overclock, the author, is also not affiliated with either AMD or Intel. I believe he prefers Intel, but that is only my belief.

If this was truly a coverup, you would not have even seen that HT was disabled. Think about it.

_________________
0100101001001101
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 24, 2003 6:11 pm 
Offline
Pilgrim
Pilgrim

Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2003 3:26 pm
Posts: 5
Johnny Mnemonic says:
Quote:
Seriously you would probably find that for the tests run, hyperthreading would not offer much of an improvement.

If it is the author's opinion that HT is useless, then let him prove it, by making a more thorough comparison of AMD 3000+, a P4 3.06 HT and a P4 3.06 non-HT.

For everyone else doubting the value of HT, Read the article and download the 16MB video from Tom's Hardware which shows the 3.06 HT's performance, not against a 3.06 non-HT, but a 3.6 (overclocked from 3.06, non-HT). While it is true that HT cannot help run a single-threaded application faster, we are not in the days of DOS anymore. We have multi-tasking operating systems and even some that can take advantage of SMP, like win XP pro and Linux OSes. Nowadays, I never run a single application without listening to internet radio, downloading or having alt-tabbed from another application still running in the background. To me, this 3 minutes video shows the importance of HT more realistically than any single test. More importantly it invalidates the AMD 3000+ review on this site because its author decided to turn off this most valuable feature.

My tacky analogy is not a bad one. Would you consider it fair to disable the turbo on a car to compare it to another car?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 24, 2003 6:40 pm 
Offline
Green Belt
Green Belt

Joined: Wed May 29, 2002 12:36 pm
Posts: 183
Location: Texa$$
Good point Vyrux. If there really was no difference between HT and non-HT, then there would be no point to HT would there? hehe. :)

_________________
Hold that thought.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group