Sonia Sotomayor ?

This is the place where all heated debates shall reside. Non-tech topics allowed. Personal attacks will not be tolerated. "Enter at your own Risk".

Moderator: The Mod Squad

Sonia Sotomayor ?

Postby thomas_w_bowman » Fri May 29, 2009 8:32 am

I'm half Mestizo, but to her - I'm sure that I'm 'Whitey'.
I have some problems with her, specifically:
Membership in 'La Raza' (KKK for Hispanics). Clearly racist.
60% of her decisions were reversed by Supreme Court (40% sounds like a very low percent of 'correct' decisions).
Contempt of Constitution (especially Bill of Rights).
Some related links:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=99420
http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/a ... rcID=48718
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/200 ... dder-to-f/
http://www.lifenews.com/nat5100.html

Meanwhile the Media goes on about her 'Life Experience' (I never got around to adding my 'Life Experience' to my resume...).

Approving her would be a massive mistake, once again Obama seems clueless about how to vet appointees...
Better living thru technology...
"Open the Pod Bay Doors, HAL..."
Join Folding team #: 33258
thomas_w_bowman
Black Belt 2nd Degree
Black Belt 2nd Degree
 
Posts: 2884
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2003 2:59 pm
Location: Minneapolis, MN

Postby CivilDissent » Sun May 31, 2009 2:31 pm

If you are a white male, in this country, you are at the bottom of the totem pole.

Democrats that are trying the keep "we need a hispanic on the court" agenda going are the same ones that filibustered the real first presidential hispanic pick. I am not making any sort of statement for, or against, the hispanic heritage. As the matter of fact, this could be any segment of society, race, religion, sex, etc., etc. The thing is that Democrats are trying to parade it as the original pick, of this category, when, in no way, is it. They filibustered the real first one.

As far as La Raza, any caucasian Republican would be burned at the stake for anything along those lines. Her statements about hispanic female vs. white male would result in the same judgement if it were the opposite. Also, what about other 'races'. Could she never competently rule on someone such as my chinese wife because she has never lived the chinese life? Does this mean that she could never rule fairly on a case involving someone from the middle east because her heritage has nothing to do with said region. Her own tongue could turn around and bite her.

One curious thing, that catches my ear when I hear it, is the reference to 'reverse discrimination'. So, does that mean that there is only forward and reverse discrimination? Do other forms of discrimination go left and right and up and down, etc.? What if some discriminates against my wife, is that sideways discrimination? No, discrimination is not forward, or reverse, it is simply discrimination. The media should stop using that liberal word 'reverse'.

On the 2nd amendment topic, most liberals will tout freedom of this or freedom of that with grandous pride but then turn around and try to cancel an amendment that the founding fathers felt was so important that there was only one amendment that there is only one amendment ahead of it.
"A mouth does not have to be open for words to be said or be spoken."

1836
The Year the Greatest Nation on Earth was
Founded!

"Honor the Texas Flag.
I pledge allegiance to thee,
Texas, one and indivisible."
CivilDissent
Black Belt
Black Belt
 
Posts: 867
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 10:42 pm

Postby Spark » Mon Jun 01, 2009 6:22 pm

We are finished.............
Spark
Anti-Static Strap
Anti-Static Strap
 
Posts: 485
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 10:36 pm


Return to The Hundred Year War

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest